Elizabeth Bennett

Elizabeth Bennett
Is Elizabeth Bennett a dirty judge?

Thursday, December 29, 2016

Supreme Court of Canada Opens Case File On Corruption At BC Court of Appeal

The Supreme Court of Canada has announced to the public that it has opened a case file in the case of the Million Dollar lawyer Greg Harney  who sent his client a bogus bill of $1.2 million for a few days of Court time and attempted to link him up with what Mr. English claims was dirty money.

Click here to review Supreme Court of Canada docket on case number 37325 Angleland Holdings Ltd and others v Gregory N. Harney Law Corporation and others
The case also involved serious allegations of corruption by British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson who were caught lying in their judgment against the English family that favoured BC lawyer Greg Harney.


Friday, November 4, 2016

The Corruption at the BC Court of Appeal Gets Worse and Worse

Dirty Liz 
"It’s easier to get a constitutional amendment than to remove a judge,” says Rocco Galati, a Toronto lawyer representing Slansky in the judicial review.

“Judges are human beings. They don’t descend from the sky or heaven, and some need to be removed. If the public knew the kinds of things some judges do, I think there would be more action taken. They make life hell not only for lawyers, but the people that have to come in front of them.”

The Canadian Judicial Council advises that it is moving ahead with the investigation of corrupt Judge Liz Bennett and her dirty gal pals on the bench Mary Saunders and Niki Garson.

We don't expect much from that group because the Canadian Judicial Council has previously stated that judicial corruption in not something they investigate because they only investigate judicial mis- conduct and corruption is so normal that it ain't something they investigate or words to like effect.  

Saturday, October 15, 2016

A Liar Does What A Liar Does When A Liar Is Caught In Her Lie -

Liar Liz Bennett
One thing about liars is that they are predictable

When a liar is caught telling a lie, the liar will either deny it was a lie or avoid dealing with it

When an honest person, a person of integrity and decent character, makes a mistake and the mistake is brought to their attention, an honest person, a person of integrity and decent character, will examine the mistake carefully, reflect on it and, if they were genuinely wrong, admit it, apologize and make amends.

People make mistakes every day.

There is no shame in it.

However, when a liar tells a lie and he or she is caught in it and the lie is fundamental to his or her position, then he or she is in deep trouble. To admit making a lie is to forfeit everything, career, position as a judge, credibility, dignity, respect from one's peers and ultimately self respect. 

Liar Nicole Garson
A liar can deny it but, if the truth is obvious, as it is in the case of the lies told by British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson in their scandalously fraudulent judgment given in the case of Gregory N. Harney Law Corporation v Aggleland Holdings Inc and others, then the liar will usually engage in what psychologists call "avoidance coping".

In psychology, avoidance coping, escape coping, or cope and avoid is a maladaptive coping mechanism characterized by the effort to avoid dealing with a stressor. Coping refers to behaviors that attempt to protect oneself from psychological damage.

Liar Mary Saunders
So when John English detected what he thought was a deliberate lie in the judgement of British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson made July 17, 2016, he applied to court for a reconsideration based on what was a clear error of fact in the reasons for judgment.

In response, if the judges had been honest people, persons of integrity and decent character, they would have examine the allegation off a mistake carefully, reflect on it and written about it in their reasons for judgment on the reconsideration motion for all the world to see what it was they had been mistaken upon and, if the mistake was incidental and of no consequence then the judgment would not change and the public would have confidence in their judgment but if the mistake was fundamental then they would change the judgment and again the public would have confidence in their judgment.  

Click here to read the 8 paragraph judgment issued September 28, 2016 on the reconsideration motion and notice that the facts Mr. English claims are incorrect are never referred to

Remember that Mr. English is claiming that the amended account was not delivered and served as the judges originally wrote in paragraph 44 of their first judgment.

Click here to read paragraph 44 of the original judgment made June 17, 2016

Unfortunately, British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson did not do what one expects of honest people or persons of integrity and decent character and they engaged in "avoidance conduct" by issuing new reason for judgment that avoid any reference to the actual mistake of fact thereby proving that their judgment is a fraud and that they are under threat and intimidation by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation or some other very powerful group of persons.

Because British Columbia Investment Management Corporation wants this property

 And British Columbia Investment Management Corporation will do what it has to get rid of the owners:

 Destroy their business buildings

  And some politicians will benefit from this property as part of their pension plan assets.



Sunday, September 18, 2016

Fordham University Law School Fooled By Phoney Canadian Judge

Liz Bennett Fools Fordham 
Poor ole Fordham University Law School was fooled by the phoney and, in our opinion, dangerously crooked Canadian Judge Elizabeth Bennett and mistakenly thinking she was an honest judge, which she is not, invited her to be on a panel on October 6, 2016. convened at the Lincoln Center campus to launch the new Neuroscience and Law Center at Fordham Law School.

Liz is so dangerous that the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police took the unusual step of applying to be an intervener in a case where crooked Judge Liz favoured political criminals and threatened the security of police informants across Canada. She is either a scumbag, compromised or incredibly stupid.  

Click here to unanimous judgement of Supreme Court of Canada rebuking the crooked Justice Liz Bennett.

There is Liz in the photo, second from the left.

Click here to go to full story

One thing about the truth is that it is like a rock.

The truth can be covered up, buried and swept away but, like a rock, it keeps sticking up, poking itself over the sand, out of the water and telling the world what is really going on behind the deceit and deception of the criminal gang operating inside the administration of justice in British Columbia, Canada.       

Monday, August 29, 2016

More Dirt On Elizabeth Bennett and Her Fitness To Be A Judge

Liz Bennett Is A Liar 
an Henry
spent more than 27 years locked inside some of Canada’s toughest jails and prisons, wrongly convicted of a string of violent sexual assaults, rapes that he didn’t commit. He was declared a dangerous offender. He lost his family, his reputation, a huge chunk of his life."

Crown counsel’s wrongful non-disclosure seriously infringed Mr. Henry’s right to a fair trial,” Hinkson wrote in his decision.

“If Mr. Henry had received the disclosure to which he was entitled, the likely result would have been his acquittal at his 1983 trial … and certainly the avoidance of his sentencing as dangerous offender.”

In 1982 Elizabeth Bennett, a newly admitted lawyer, went to work for the same dirty law firm, the Provincial Crown Counsel's office that suppressed evidence and otherwise destroyed a  person by locking him up when he had committed no crimes.

According to her online biography:

From 1987 to 1994 Elizabeth Bennett was  a senior appellate counsel dealing with criminal appeals.

From 1996 to 1997 Elizabeth Bennett was acting director of criminal appeals.

During all of this period, Elizabeth Bennett and her pals at the Crown Counsel`s office were part of an organization that suppressed evidence and kept an innocent man in jail.

This kind of conduct is commonplace by government lawyers in British Columbia.

In 1997, a corrupt Canadian Justice Minister, Anne McLellan, appointed Liz to the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

McLellan appointed a number of crooked judges to the Courts of Canada and those judges caused a lot of harm and harmed many innocent people and Elizabeth Bennett is one of those judges.

Observers say Elizabeth Bennett is a sadistic psychopath because she takes delight in harming people.

In the Editors opinion, Elizabeth Bennett is a lowlife criminal who made a fraudulent judgment in the case involving the English family and lawyer Greg Harney who tried to rip them off for $1.12 million because she took secret instructions from third parties connected to Mr. Harney and the Government of British Columbia.

Mr. English and his advisors have documented proof that Liz Bennett is a liar and her judgement was fraudulent and they have provided that proof to the RCMP the Canadian Judicial Council, the Minister of Justice for  British Columbia and the Minister of Justice for Canada.

Elizabeth Bennett is not the only judge person from the Crown Prosecutors office who may have been directly involved in the suppression of evidence in the Ivan Henry case.

The current Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia Austin Cullen was formerly the Regional Crown Counsel when the Crown Counsel Office that was suppressing evidence in the Ivan Henry case and current Supreme Court of British Columbia Justice Heather Holmes was also a lawyer in that crooked office. Heather Holmes has a clear and established record of suppressing evidence to protect BC government insiders in at case involving British Columbia lawyer John Carten who was railroaded by the lawyers at the Attorney General Ministry and judges from that Ministry a few years back.  Mr. Carten maintains the Water War Crimes web site that has done an excellent job exposing legal and judicial corruption in Canada resulting in the termination of a number of those legal and judicial criminals. 

Dirty Suzanne Anton 
More importantly the present Attorney General of British Columbia Suzanne Anton was also involved in the Ivan Henry case.

Suzanne, like the criminal perverts that kept and innocent man behind bars for 27 years instructed her crooked lawyers to resist the Ivan Henry case to the bitter end when the Federal Crown under newly elected Justin Trudeau had already agreed to a settlement.

Suzanne Anton was a player in the same effort by Heather Holmes to suppress evidence in the case of lawyer John Carten where both Elizabeth Bennett and Healther Holmes were actively protecting criminals inside the administration of justice.

Suzanne, Elizabeth and Heather should all be given lengthy jail terms so they can have a taste of their own medicine.

Elizabeth Bennett, Heather Holmes and Austin Cullen, all of them crooked, was all appointed to their judge positions by the notorious former dirty Minister of Justice, Anne McLellan

Monday, August 15, 2016

Rare Ruling By Court of Appeal Registrar Outerbridge Hailed By Skeptics

In a rare move, Registrar Timothy Outerbridge at the Court of Appeal for British Columbia granted John English and his family an extension of time to file their written arguments asking the Court of Appeal to reconsider its decision based on the fraudulent statements contained in the judgment of Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Niki Garson delivered in June 2016. 

Legal observers are hailing Outerbridge's decision which may assist John English and his allies to topple one of the most corrupt networks of judges in Canadian history. 

Premier Clark and John English
This move coincides with the information that the RCMP are conducting a rare criminal investigation of allegations of improper interference with the judicial process and criminal conspiracy to commit judicial fraud which may result in a public relations disaster for the administration of Premier Christy Clark that appears to be behind the judicial manipulation and which is designed to destroy John English so that politicians and bureaucrats can loot his family property and put it in their pension plan.

See more at www.bcimc.info

Friday, July 8, 2016

Did Elizabeth Bennett Deliberately Make A Crooked Ruling In The Basi and Virk Case ?

Liz Bennett
So, let's go back in time and remember that in 2007 Elizabeth Bennett, a former high level BC Government prosecutor with a reputation for covering up for pedofiles, was selected, out of 100 possible other judges, to preside at a trial involving Mr.  Basi and Virk  that related to allegations of high level corruption in the Government of British Columbia related to the sale of BC Rail to a company headed by David MacLean, a friend of former Freeemason and convicted criminal Premier Gordon Campbell.  This information assists to explain why Elizabeth Bennett was selected to preside at English appeal on the Harney case that is also related to high level government corruption against the English family and their property and involved Freemasons and the Editors believe Judge Liz is controlled by a Freemason mafia in British Columbia that was, in part, involved in the attack against the English family.

For the record, Mr. Harney has denied he is a Freemason but he has not denied he fabricated evidence with intent to mislead the court, a matter Liz Bennett and her gal pals, Niki Garson and Mary Saunders, are covering up by their judgment.   

Judge Liz Bennett made a very bad decision in the Basi and Virk case that threatened the safety of a police informants both in the Basi and Virk case and throughout Canada.

The case was appealed to the British Columbia Court of Appeal where two Freemason judges, Lance Finch and Ian Donald, sided with Liz while Justice Cathy Ryan, presumably not a Freemason, dissented saying the informant should be protected from exposure.

The case went to the Supreme Court of Canada where all of the Judges of the Supreme Court sided with Justice Ryan and said Finch Donald and Bennett were wrong and the informer should be protected.  The case was so notorious that the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police applied to be intervenors and argued that the judgment by Liz was wrong and dangerous to public safety. So, based on her dirty decision in that case, we know what side of the law Elizabeth Bennett is on when it comes to protecting crooks in the Government.

Jason Lindsay and Greg
According to Jack English,  Harney is a good friend of Greg Martell, "best friend" was what Harney stated, who is the Dominion Lending Mortgage Broker referred to on the Buziak Murder Blog, who is in turn the best friend of Jason Zailo, Lindsay's high flying realtor boyfriend at the time of her murder, also referred to on the Buziak Murder Blog.
Jason is the one with the knife pointed at Lindsay's throat in the Buziak Murder Blog photo of him and Lindsay and Greg Martel before her murder on February 2, 2008, two months after crooked Justice Elizabeth Bennett made her ruling that put in jeopardy every police informant in Canada.  According to the blog, Lindsay Buziak had told her father that she had seen and heard some things she wished she had not seen or heard and ... well... we will let the readers connect the dots.... for now,... but,... the circle of corruption around Justice Elizabeth Bennett is getting tighter and tighter, like a noose around her necks, as each day passes and more information comes to our attention.

More dirt on Elizabeth Bennett at www.bcimc.info



Saturday, June 18, 2016


The evidence is continuing to mount against Elizabeth Bennett who the Editors regarded as a crooked judge who fixes cases to favour government insiders.

Joining by two other  "bitches on the bench" at the British Columbia Court of Appeal Elizabeth Bennett soiled the reputation Court, again, by finding in favour of lawyer Greg Harney in his million dollar fee dispute fee  with the English family and their holding companies that he briefly represented when the Government of British Columbia and its agents used terrorism and other crimes to loot the English family property at fire sale prices after agents of the Government started the fires and used other criminal tactics to cheat the English family and steal their property.

Elizabeth and the other two judges at the Court of  Appeal turned a blind eye to clear evidence of fraud and fabrication of evidence by Victoria lawyer Greg Harney.l

Experienced lawyers say the bill should have been between $10,000 and $25,000 so why did the bitches on the bench allow this Travesty of Justice to stand especially when there was evidence of criminal activity in the proceedings by the lawyer in order to advance his case. 

The Editors believe that insiders with the Government of British Columbia blackmailed or threatened the three judges, Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson because that is the only plausible reason the judges would go against the law that clearly favoured Mr. English and his family companies and reject the new evidence that Mr. English had uncovered that proved that lawyer Greg Harney, or someone acting on his behalf, fabricated false evidence that he used to persuade the lower court judge, Master Peter Keighley, to grant a judgment against the English family for $220,000 in what was clearly a corrupt billing practice.

Bitch Liz Bennett
The allegation that Elizabeth Bennett would succumb to blackmail or some other threat is easy to believe because Elizabeth has a clear track record of benefitting criminal insiders with the British Columbia Government and was appointed a judge after a career with the British Columbia Crown prosecution service where, our sources report, she was part of their crooked pedofile cover up squad of lawyers protecting some of British Columbia's dirtiest sexual perverts and child abusers that included a number of government employees including some judges and prominent lawyers.

 It is believed that Bennett will profit from the decision because of her pension plan investments that are managed by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that profited from the crimes carried out against the English family.

Bitch Mary Saunders
The allegation against Justice Mary Saunders is also believable because she Campney and Murphy that dissolved after its major client Eron Mortgage was caught in a "massive fraud" where thousands of investors investors lost an estimated $182 million..Saunders was appointed in 1992 by Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Justice Minister Kim Campbell both of whom had a reputation for appointing criminals and sleaze bags to the court.  

Harney initially sent Mr. English a $1million dollar bill for a couple of days of court work and, according to English, pretending to look for alternate financing. 

Harney then used threats of legal proceedings if English did not immediately approve the bill which is a form of extortion and a criminal offence in Canada but the bitches n the courtMary Liz and Nicole, felt that was just fine which means that other lawyers can rely on this ugly precedent to act in a similar manner against unsuspecting citizens and get away with it. Welcome to British Columbia and its ridiculously crooked court system.

Knowing that his initial bill was "an act of obvious insanity", Harney then sent a revised bill for $550,000 and commenced a lawsuit to collect the grossly inflated second bill.

The initial hearing was before Master Peter Keighley who is suspected to be part of the Freemason criminal gang that operates inside the British Columbia court system and that was part of the crimes carried out against the English family

Bitch Niki Garson
Keighley first came to the editors attention due to his role in the destruction of British Columbia lawyer Karl Eisbrenner where Keighley presided over a Kangaroo court that relied upon a fraudulent psychiatric report craftily devised by a fraudulent psychiatrist to label Mr. Eisbrenner as delusional and disbar him because Eisbrenner was working on a law case that might have destroyed the career of yet to be elected BC Premier Gordon Campbell. Campbell.

Click here to read more about the case of Karl Eisbrenner.

Keighley should never have presided on the Harney v English case case because he is an employee of the BC Government, he is not a judge, and he had an indirect financial interest in the outcomebecause of her pension plan investments that are managed by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that profited from the crimes carried out against the English family a fact that did not become apparent to the English family until many months after the hearing but that Keighly knew about from the day he entered the courtroom.


1.        After the hearing before the Registrar and the Chambers Judge, the appellants discovered that the respondents had not delivered and served the Appointment “with the bill attached” upon the appellants as required by the Legal Profession Act and the respondents had improperly entered in the court record the altered backdated bill that was subsequently relied upon by the Registrar without proper delivery or service. 

2.        The admission of the new evidence of the improper use of the altered back dated bill and the failure to comply with the mandatory procedures of the Legal Profession Act with respect to delivery and service of the bill satisfies tests of relevance, reliability and reasonable likelihood of effecting the outcome of the hearings because this evidence goes directly to jurisdiction and raises the a reasonable suspicion of fraud by the respondents that should be addressed and responded to by the Court.

3     The Appointment that commenced the review proceeding before the Registrar under the Legal Profession Act named John English and three corporate entities as respondents, but none of those corporations nor John English were identified as persons charged in the bill that was attached to the Appointment that was used to commence the proceeding contrary to the Legal Profession Act and the Supreme Court Civil Rules.  
          Statement of Facts, paragraph 17 to 19.
          Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9, s.69. and 70.
          Supreme Court Civil Rules, Rule 14-1, (21) and (22). 
          Affidavit 6 of English, CA040838, November 19, 2014, para 6, Exhibit” D”. 
          Affidavit 7 of English, CA040838, February 9, 2015, para 2 to 7, Exhibits “D"
4.        The bill that was attached to the Appointment had not been previously delivered to the appellants Angleland, Nederland, Paradise Beach Resorts Inc. or John English contrary to s. 69 (1) of the Legal Profession Act.  
Legal Profession Act, SBC, 1998, c.9, s. 69 (1).
Interpretation Act RSBC 1996, c. 238, s. 29.
Statement of Facts, para. 17.
5.        The Appointment with the bill attached was not served upon any of the persons charged with the bill as required by section 70 (4) of the Legal Profession Act and the Supreme Court Civil Rules.
Legal Profession Act, SBC, 1998, c.9, s. 70 (4).
Supreme Court Civil Rules, Rule 14-1, (21) and (22).   
Statement of Facts, para. 19.
6.        The review was carried out by the registrar was on the basis of the altered back dated bill that had never been delivered or served to any of the appellant
Transcript, March13, 2014, p. 23, l.40. to p. 24, l.23.  
Statement of Facts, para. 20 -23.
7.        The Registrar did not have jurisdiction to conduct a review of a bill that had not been delivered and served upon the appellants in compliance with Part 8 of the Legal Profession Act.
          Kelly v McMillan, 2003 BCJ, No. 430.     
8.        As a result of the failure of the respondents to comply with the mandatory scheme set out in the Legal Professions Act, the Registrar lacked jurisdiction review the bill, to allow charges and disbursements for any services provided by the respondents to the appellants and to issue the certificates of fees against the appellants.
     Legal Profession Act, SBC [1998], c. 9, Part 8, ss. 64-79
      Kelly v McMillan, 2003 BCJ, No. 430, Goepel, J. 
     Tungohan v Gebara, 2011, BCJ, No. 2145, Registrar Sainty.
A Bad Place To Invest or Seek Justice

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

The Whitewash of Glen Clark by Elizabeth Bennett

For some strange reason Global News has decided to review the strange case of the take down of British Columbia Premier Glen Clark by the RCMP. in a story entitled  "The police and the premier: remembering the RCMP raid on Glen Clark’s home" by journalist, Justin McElroy.  

Click here to co to Global News Story of March 2 2016

 ...On August 20, 1999, the majority of the warrant against Clark was released to the public, and Attorney General, Ujjal Dosanjh, announced the premier was under criminal investigation. The next day, Clark stepped down, maintaining his innocence....

Eventually, the case went before the Elizabeth Bennett who was appointed a judge in 1997 when Glen Clark was the Premier of British Columbia and Ujjal Dosanjh was the Attorney General.  Bennett had had a long career as a British Columbia civil servant, not surprisingly Bennttt ruled in favour of the leader of the gangs that approved her for the job no doubt with the approval of others from the Ottawa based political gangs that gave her the final approval.

Bennett wrote as follows concerning Premier Clark:

There is no question Mr. Clark exercised poor judgement in hiring Mr. Pilarinos to do renovations for him when Mr. Pilarinos had an application for a casino licence before the government. However, there is nothing in his conduct that crosses the line from an act of folly to behaviour calling for criminal sanctions” – Justice Elizabeth Bennett, acquitting Clark in 2002, two years after charges were laid. 

In the Editors opinion, Justice Elizabeth Bennett was put in the case against Glen Clark because she could be relied on to follow orders from her owners and that is the same reason she was recently put on the case involving British Columbia lawyer, John Frederick Carten, and British Columbia resort owner, John Douglas English, and, probably, a host of other cases where her owners or handlers have an interest.

That criminal attack on John Frederick Carten and his family by a criminal gangs operating secretly inside in the courts and government of British Columbia is well documented and not denied by the British Columbia government.

The criminal attack on John Douglas English and his family by a similar gang is also well documented.

The criminal attack on Karen Gibbs and her family be a similar gangs is well documented.

Over and over we hear stories of abuse and crookedness by the government and the judiciary and it is becoming more and more obvious that there is a plan.

As these stories come to light, we begin to recognize and prove who the criminals and believe it or not they begin to drop dead or quit. 

A SAD STORY BUT ONE THAT APPEARS TO BE VERY TRUE and not uncommon in Canada!!!

We wonder if Justice Bennett's life is in danger and if the RCMP have been alerted to the dangers she faces from the criminal gang that has murdered other judges in Canada including several in British Columbia and one, possibly, two in Ottawa.

It seems shame for them to kill their own like that.

So why are  Justin McElroy and Global News using this particular time to bring these matters that concern the legitimacy of Elizabeth Bennett back into the public mind?
We never knew Elizabeth Bennett.

 She did her job. 

She was definitely on a mission.     

But, she does have this uncanny knack of showing up in case after case where there is a government interest to protect.

Saturday, February 27, 2016

More Evidence That Elizabeth Bennett Is Stooge Judge Who Works for the BC Government

Elizabeth Bennett
The Editors believe Elizabeth Bennett is a dirty judge who fixes cases to benefit the Government of British Columbia.

Except for a few brief years in a private law practice, Elizabeth Bennett was a career civil servant who was appointed to the bench with the approval Prime Minister Jean Chretien and his gang in 1997, in Ottawa, with the prior agreement and approval of the British Columbia Ministry of the Attorney General, the Ministry that sends the approved lawyer list to the federal government for approval. At the time, the Ministry of the Attorney General was covering up serious insider crimes and they needed someone in the court apparatus to manage a few cases.  

After she was appointed and in case after case, Ms. Bennett made decisions that benefitted the BC Government.

In a recent case in July 2015, the lower court judge, Supreme Court Justice Walker, ruled——after a 147-day trial—against the Government  of British Columbia and found the Government of British Columbia liable for negligent and a breach of duty and said some social workers showed a "reckless disregard for their obligation to protect children."

Click here to read more about Justice Walker's decision

The Government appealed and on a preliminary ruling at the Court of Appeal, the Government arranged for their old pal, Elizabeth Bennett, to be on the case.

Click here to go to story about Elizabeth Bennett and the appeal of Justice Walker's decision

For the purpose of this analysis, the outcome of the hearing is unimportant because the case is continuing, however, the important point is that, in case after case, where a BC Government interest is at stake the BC Government is appointing its former employee and faithful servant, Elizabeth Bennett, to be the judge and this is just plain wrong because there is a huge conflict of interest and it is becoming plainly obvious that Elizabeth Bennett is a government stooge who does dirty work for the BC Government.

Stooge definition: a person who serves merely to support or assist others, particularly in doing unpleasant work.

Synonyms include: underling, flunky, lackey, toady

If you have evidence of corrupt practices by Elizabeth Bennett please contact our Editors and, with your approval, we will share that information with our readers so the public are better warned about her activities.